and up-to-date on our AI empowered digital cytology solutions.
.png)
- 100 thyroid ThinPrep slides categorized forground truth diagnosis (The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology) using a consensus of the original cytology report interpretation and the surgical pathology findings. All cases had a surgical result except Nondiagnostic cases.
- Urine slides were digitized as single-layer (S-WSIs)and 7-Z-layer (7-WSIs) WSIs by the 3D-Histech scanner and analyzed with AI-assistance software (AIxTHY)
- 5 reviewers including 3 cytopathologist (CP) and5 cytologists (CT) evaluated slides with a 2-week washout period between research arms:
- Arm 1- Microscopy only
- Arm 2- S-WSI with AIxTHY-assistance
- Arm 3- 7-WSI with AIxTHY-assistance
- Performance Metrics:
Comparison of study diagnosis with ground truth cytology diagnosis for 3 Arms across 500 total reads.
- Binary diagnostic accuracy (positive: TBS-III and above; negative: TBS-II)
- TBS category concordance (TBS-I~VI)
- Mean diagnostic turnaround time (second)
- Sensitivity: Improved with AIxTHY (Arm 2: 81.3%;Arm 3: 83.0%) compared with microscopy (Arm 1: 68.7%; p < 0.001); no difference between AI-assisted arms (p = 0.522).
- Specificity: Slightly lower with AIxTHY (Arm 2:68.0%; Arm 3: 65.7%) than microscopy (73.1%), significant for Arm 1 vs. Arm 3(p = 0.049).
- Overall Accuracy: Increased from 70.3%(microscopy) to 76.4–76.6% (AIxTHY; p = 0.004).
- Diagnostic Efficiency: Mean review time reduced by 32.8% (163.6 s → 109.9 s; p < 0.001).
- TBS Concordance: Overall comparable (Arm 1:52.4%; Arm 2: 51.4%; Arm 3: 53.5%).
- Higher agreement for indeterminate TBS-III with AIxTHY (44–53%) vs. microscopy (25%).
- Nondiagnostic (TBS-I) Rates: Decreased from10.8% to 6.4–5.6%, representing a 41–48% reduction.
- Several TBS-I cases were reclassified to TBS-II or ≥TBS-III under AI-assisted review.
AIxTHY improved sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and efficiency while reducing review time and nondiagnostic rates, with minimal impact on specificity. These results support its role in streamlining thyroid FNAC workflows through AI-assisted digital cytopathology
- 14 positive (HGUC) urine cytology specimens (cytospin and ThinPrep) digitized with Leica Aperio AT2 scanner at 4 different scan modes:
- Mode A- Default automatic
- Mode B- Optimized automatic
- Mode C- Manually focused points of adjustment
- Mode D- Multilayer Z-stacking
- Performance metrics:
- Rate of successful scanning (total slides that obtain WSI files from scanner);
- Number of high risk cells detected by AI algorithm
- Coverage rate of high risk cells (detected high risk cells in one Z-layer divided by the total high risk cells detected in 21 Z-layer WSI per slide)
- Advanced scan modes increase successful slide scanning, but does not increase the average high risk cell detection or coverage rates
- More high risk cells were detected with TP than cytospin but with comparable coverage rates
- More Z-layers increased average high risk cell detection and coverage rates
Advanced scan modes improve the success rate of obtaining an optimal WSI and the number and coverage rate of high risk cells increases with multiple Z-layers. More high risk cells were detected on ThinPrep vs cytospin but this did not significantly affect the AI algorithm analytic results.
- 131 urine cytology slides digitized and analyzed with AI-assisted algorithm for detecting and ranking abnormal urothelial cells using criteria from The Paris System (TPS2.0); ground truth diagnosis established by an expert panel
- Two arm study with 1 cytopathologist (CP) in both arms and 2 cytologists (CT) in the AI-assisted Arm 2
- Arm 1: CP review of urine cytology glass slide with diagnosis (4 week washout period)
- Arm 2: CP and CT review of AI-assisted inferred WSI of urine cytology slide with quantitative data statistics
- Performance Metrics: Comparison of research TPS diagnosis with expert diagnosis and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy
- Conventional Microscopy vs AI-Assisted Interpretation
- Sensitivity: 87% vs 92.3% (+5.1)
- Specificity: 100% vs 100%
- PPV: 100% vs 100%
- NPV: 94.8% vs 96.8% (+2.0)
- AI-Assisted Microscopy, CTA vs CTB vs CP interpretation
- Sensitivity: 79.55 VS 82.1% VS 92.3%
- Specificity: 100% vs 98.9% vs 100%
- PPV: 100% vs 97% vs 100%
- NPV: 92% vs 92.9% vs 96.8%
- ĸ (95% CI): 0.845 vs 0.847 vs 0.994
Ai-assisted interpretation was comparable to the expert consensus diagnosis, with superior sensitivity and NPV. AI-assisted interpretations showed near perfect agreement with the expert consensus diagnosis (ĸ = 0.944) and the microscopic diagnosis (ĸ = 0.862).
- Develop a machine-learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to assist monitoring morphologic changes in human embryonic stem cells (hESC) in color, using bright field microscopy images
- Pilot Study: Train the model to estimate degree of stem cell differentiation at the Hepatic Progenitor Cell (HPC stage), the critical checkpoint for hepatocyte differentiation, based on cellular morphologic features
- Initial training set: Expert annotated images of 341 successful HPC differentiations and 366 failed HPC differentiations
- Cross-validation set: Images of 86 successful and 51 failed HPC results
- Test set: Images of 64 successful and 29 failed HPC results
- Failed differentiation = no differentiation or differentiation into non-hepatocyte tissue types
- Performance Metrics: Accuracy and F1 scores of test set
The AI model showed excellent performance compared with the conventional method of determining degree of hepatocyte differentiation
- Accuracy = 0.978
- F1 score = 0.975
AI-assisted models have the potential to improve the detection of degrees of hepatocyte differentiation, thereby improving the efficiency of a manual process that is very time-intensive.
- Descriptive study using deidentified urine cytology slides digitized into WSI
- Artificial intelligence model training on slides with “active learning” to improve results
- Annotated WSI initially used to train computational model, then expert review of results with feedback to the model to learn.
- Sequence was repeated until satisfactory results were achieved
- AI deep-learning model was able to differentiate nucleus from cytoplasm to calculate N/C ratio using whole slide images (WSI)
- The model correctly provided statistical data (N/C ratio and nuclear size) on cells and successfully categorized them as atypical (NHGUC or AUC) or suspicious (SHGUC or HGUC) cells
AI-assistance for interpreting urine cytology using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology has the potential to enhance abnormal cell detection and diagnostic concordance.
- Development of an automated deep-learning AI model for circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis and enumeration
- Fluorescent microscopy CTC images (CK+/CD45-/DAPI+) collected from blood samples of non-small cell lung carcinoma patient by CMx CTC capture platform
- AI model developed with active learning implemented to train after expert image annotation on 20 slides and validation with 4 extra images
- 18 new test images studied for performance
- AI model predicted 34% more total CTC than current methods (1775 vs 1328)
- AI model recovered 45% more total CTCs absent from original human annotation (2507 vs 1732 events)
- AI model produced 90% time savings over conventional methods of enumeration (< 20 min vs approximately 4 hours)
- The model correctly characterized features of circulating tumor microthrombi (CTM), including CTC clusters and CTC-associated immune cells
An AI model trained to detect and enumerate circulating tumor cells in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients outperformed semiautomated methods, with higher sensitivity and significantly reduced review time (less than 20 minutes) for CTC enumeration in lung cancer specimens.
- Development of a deep-learning based image analysis model for cell classification and enumeration in urine cytology
- De-identified whole slide images (WSI) digitized and “active learning” approach used to train the model
- 3 sub-images (3335 cells) annotated by 3 domain experts for initial training
- Cells classified into 7 categories: High grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), cluster HGUC, atypical neoplastic cell, atypical reactive cell, inflammatory cell, epithelial cell, and unidentified cell, with expert feedback to the model
- Pilot study after training involved 2 sub-images from 5 digital slides (10 total sub-images)
- Ai model successfully learned the morphologies of all 6 cell types and was able to quantify total cell counts in each class
An artificial intelligence model that enumerates and classifies abnormal urothelial cells may improve urine cytology throughput, accuracy and reproducibility.

